Yan YJ, Yang Z, Chao RY, Shi JL. E74-like E26 transformation-specific transcription factor 3 in gastric cancer: Functions, mechanisms, and clinical translation - unresolved issues. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(8): 120240 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i8.120240]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
Great thanks to editors and reviewers for their professional guidance on our review about ELF3 in gastric cancer. The whole peer review revision and online publishing process was efficient, transparent and highly standardized. The valuable suggestions from reviewers effectively improved the academic logic, evidence interpretation and clinical translational discussion of our manuscript. We are fully satisfied with the high-quality service provided by World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, and we intend to submit our follow-up related gastrointestinal oncology research to this journal in the future.